In PGA Tour v. Martin, Casey Martin was a disabled golfer who requested that he use a golf cart to play golf. Martin suffers from Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome, a congenital and degenerative circulatory disorder that, in Martin’s case, obstructs the flow of blood from his right leg back to his heart. The consequences of this for Martin are that his right leg has atrophied, that he suffers from severe pain in that leg, and that he consequently has great difficulty walking significant distances. Moreover, walking for an extended time subjects Martin to a heightened risk of hemorrhaging, blood clots, bone fractures, and, conceivably, having his right leg amputated. Martin argued that the Americans with Disabilities Act requires that the PGA Tour “make reasonable modifications” for disabled individuals, otherwise they would be in violation of the ADA.The use of golf carts is prohibited during tournaments by the governing agency, PGA Tour. Martin sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor. In philosophical terms, the Supreme Court held that the individual right denied caused greater harm than the need for uniformity or equality in practice. Rights, in other words, are superior to conventional arrangements of justice established by majorities.Using the Supreme Court case, the understanding of justice from Sandel, including Aristotle and his notion of Ethics as discussed in class, the modern understanding of what liberalism stands for, and Rawls’s understanding of justice as fairness, and any number of authors we have read on equality and justice, state which side has the better argument.You are encouraged to consult the Casey Martin case,which is posted on Canvas, but it is not required. If relying upon Sandel, the citation goes to Sandel. Should you cite the posted Casey Martin case, the citation will be to the page in Word and not to the actual page numbers of the case. So cite the case like this: (Martin, 5). In the text, the first reference goes like this: In Casey Martin v. PGA Tour, blah blah blah…But the second goes like this: In Casey Martin, blah blah blah… Do not write an essay on your feelings about this subject without reference to any thinkers discussed in class or in Sandel’s book. Do not rely exclusively or extensively on authors not found in Sandel. Do not attempt to write an answer to a question I did not ask. It is acceptable to use outside research, but not at the expense of Sandel’s book.
by Classy Writers | Jun 8, 2020 | Law /Civil
In PGA Tour v. Martin, Casey Martin was a disabled golfer who requested that he use a…
A professional Academic Services Provider
Superb Writers Classic Essays Prioritizes Quality, Accountability, Professionalism, and Timely Delivery
At Superb Writers, we have qualified experts including writers providing quality papers at all times. The company seeks to aid learners all through the education process while easing their journey. Customer satisfaction is our emblem, and as the name suggests, our customers have a SUPERB experience with us. We purpose to help learners comprehend their classwork and homework to attain high grades. Our writers, editors, managers, customer service personnel are friendly; hence, providing a conducive environment to interact with you; the client. We offer guidance across various tasks including essay wring, article writing, thesis proposals, dissertations, coursework, and project management among others.Our Core Values
1. Professionalism: Our staff are highly trained to accommodate every personality. We handle our clients respectfully, understanding the fact that we are here because of you.
2. High-Quality: As typified by our name, we provide quality services as desired by our clients.
3. Confidentiality We safeguard what we share with our clients; hence, information shared remains confidential.
Assurances
4. Quality Assurance: Our qualified writers are clustered as per their expertise and tasks matched with the respective fields. Moreover, we have the current software to check paper quality; thus, delivering error free products.
5. Money Back Policy: As a client-oriented service, we offer 100% refund for the following: if we received a double payment from you; if you placed similar orders twice (or more) and paid for all of them; the writer has not been assigned; you asked to cancel the order within 20 minutes after placing it; an e-Check payment has been sent (the Dispute Manager will contact you accordingly). Other cases involve a comprehensive investigation by the Dispute Department and feedback given within 24 hours. We value our customers; therefore, the process will be fair, fast, and precise.
5 .Free Revisions: You can request for revisions at no additional cost. However, this does not entail complete change of the initial order instructions and if it is not past ten days upon your approval.
6. 24/7 Customer Support: Our support team is always available to help when needed.
Process of Placing an Order
NOTE: If you have any question, always contact our support team before the commencement of your project. ALL THE BEST”:
Recent Comments